<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Jabberpop Unwrapped</title>
	<link>http://dougdosberg.com/2007/09/05/jabberpop-unwrapped/</link>
	<description>&#160; - Web Design, XHTML, CSS</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2012 02:35:19 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: Kirsten</title>
		<link>http://dougdosberg.com/2007/09/05/jabberpop-unwrapped/#comment-1003</link>
		<author>Kirsten</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Oct 2007 03:22:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://dougdosberg.com/2007/09/05/jabberpop-unwrapped/#comment-1003</guid>
		<description>what a really clever site idea..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>what a really clever site idea..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kacey Green</title>
		<link>http://dougdosberg.com/2007/09/05/jabberpop-unwrapped/#comment-637</link>
		<author>Kacey Green</author>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Sep 2007 05:43:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://dougdosberg.com/2007/09/05/jabberpop-unwrapped/#comment-637</guid>
		<description>Glad to see you did it!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Glad to see you did it!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kmatthai</title>
		<link>http://dougdosberg.com/2007/09/05/jabberpop-unwrapped/#comment-628</link>
		<author>kmatthai</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Sep 2007 20:02:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://dougdosberg.com/2007/09/05/jabberpop-unwrapped/#comment-628</guid>
		<description>i'm glad you unwrapped it! impressive!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i&#8217;m glad you unwrapped it! impressive!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doug Dosberg</title>
		<link>http://dougdosberg.com/2007/09/05/jabberpop-unwrapped/#comment-619</link>
		<author>Doug Dosberg</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Sep 2007 05:08:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://dougdosberg.com/2007/09/05/jabberpop-unwrapped/#comment-619</guid>
		<description>Hey, thanks for your comments guys! 

&lt;strong&gt;@Martin:&lt;/strong&gt; One benefit of rapid development cycles is that they bring ideas to the canvas much faster without high risk. This project only cost me three days and leaving it behind is not a huge loss. 

I believe in the Bob Ross method of creation. Executing rapid ideas one after another until all of the ideas layered upon each other create a picture. The one thing that always amazed me about Bob Ross was that he never made mistakes, nor did he ever change his mind halfway through a painting about where a tree was going to live. One last thing about Bob - most artists spend months painting a single painting. Bob could paint a masterpiece in thirty minutes.     

&lt;strong&gt;@Bassam:&lt;/strong&gt; This was more of an exercise if anything. If I come across reasons to continue development I will then do so. I have to admit though, I've had some feedback from colleagues and friends that have inspired me to make some changes.  

 &lt;strong&gt;@Zain:&lt;/strong&gt; It's interesting you mention a thumbs up. When I initially sketched up the design for this project last Saturday morning I planned on developing a disagree function. That was one of the many features that I cut in order to get this wrapped up within my three day hibernation period. And yeah, could be seen as a Digg for opinions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, thanks for your comments guys! </p>
<p><strong>@Martin:</strong> One benefit of rapid development cycles is that they bring ideas to the canvas much faster without high risk. This project only cost me three days and leaving it behind is not a huge loss. </p>
<p>I believe in the Bob Ross method of creation. Executing rapid ideas one after another until all of the ideas layered upon each other create a picture. The one thing that always amazed me about Bob Ross was that he never made mistakes, nor did he ever change his mind halfway through a painting about where a tree was going to live. One last thing about Bob - most artists spend months painting a single painting. Bob could paint a masterpiece in thirty minutes.     </p>
<p><strong>@Bassam:</strong> This was more of an exercise if anything. If I come across reasons to continue development I will then do so. I have to admit though, I&#8217;ve had some feedback from colleagues and friends that have inspired me to make some changes.  </p>
<p> <strong>@Zain:</strong> It&#8217;s interesting you mention a thumbs up. When I initially sketched up the design for this project last Saturday morning I planned on developing a disagree function. That was one of the many features that I cut in order to get this wrapped up within my three day hibernation period. And yeah, could be seen as a Digg for opinions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zain</title>
		<link>http://dougdosberg.com/2007/09/05/jabberpop-unwrapped/#comment-615</link>
		<author>Zain</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Sep 2007 00:34:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://dougdosberg.com/2007/09/05/jabberpop-unwrapped/#comment-615</guid>
		<description>A little diggesk dare i say it! 

Still it's pretty cool in terms of coding, designing etc let alone in such a time limit.

I hate the fact i have to login to agree though.

Keep up the good work and nice blog design here too.

ps. i think the agree button looks a little empty, maybe a big thumbs up icon i dunno.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A little diggesk dare i say it! </p>
<p>Still it&#8217;s pretty cool in terms of coding, designing etc let alone in such a time limit.</p>
<p>I hate the fact i have to login to agree though.</p>
<p>Keep up the good work and nice blog design here too.</p>
<p>ps. i think the agree button looks a little empty, maybe a big thumbs up icon i dunno.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bassam</title>
		<link>http://dougdosberg.com/2007/09/05/jabberpop-unwrapped/#comment-611</link>
		<author>Bassam</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Sep 2007 20:47:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://dougdosberg.com/2007/09/05/jabberpop-unwrapped/#comment-611</guid>
		<description>simply brilliant! For just 3 days this is an impressive outcome. Just curious, are you planning on continuing this site and developing it or is just a quick project?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>simply brilliant! For just 3 days this is an impressive outcome. Just curious, are you planning on continuing this site and developing it or is just a quick project?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Martin Ringlein</title>
		<link>http://dougdosberg.com/2007/09/05/jabberpop-unwrapped/#comment-605</link>
		<author>Martin Ringlein</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Sep 2007 11:36:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://dougdosberg.com/2007/09/05/jabberpop-unwrapped/#comment-605</guid>
		<description>Awesome Work! I am pretty impressed with the three-day-turnaround. I think this could be the start of a new era of super-star that can design, develop and deploy their own ideas faster than most executives can put a team of 5 together to try and attempt to do all of those things over 3 months (as opposed to 3 days).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Awesome Work! I am pretty impressed with the three-day-turnaround. I think this could be the start of a new era of super-star that can design, develop and deploy their own ideas faster than most executives can put a team of 5 together to try and attempt to do all of those things over 3 months (as opposed to 3 days).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

