<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Propeller Redesign. Fail?</title>
	<link>http://dougdosberg.com/2008/07/24/propeller-redesign-fail/</link>
	<description>&#160; - Web Design, XHTML, CSS</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 07 Sep 2010 10:06:30 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: BGdesign</title>
		<link>http://dougdosberg.com/2008/07/24/propeller-redesign-fail/#comment-11352</link>
		<author>BGdesign</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2009 06:09:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://dougdosberg.com/2008/07/24/propeller-redesign-fail/#comment-11352</guid>
		<description>Look Doug I like your humble approach. But lets not sugar coat this, its a poor attempt at coping the Adobe home page at best. 
Thanks for being a regulator, we need more in our world.
Quality control: nice post.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Look Doug I like your humble approach. But lets not sugar coat this, its a poor attempt at coping the Adobe home page at best.<br />
Thanks for being a regulator, we need more in our world.<br />
Quality control: nice post.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Martin Ringlein</title>
		<link>http://dougdosberg.com/2008/07/24/propeller-redesign-fail/#comment-5266</link>
		<author>Martin Ringlein</author>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Jul 2008 00:07:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://dougdosberg.com/2008/07/24/propeller-redesign-fail/#comment-5266</guid>
		<description>All I can say is, I agree with you 100% ... great observation of the new redesign. A little bit a of a "fail" in my opinion as well. 

Designs like this it is easy to see a lot of attention to detail above-the-fold and then see it fall a apart -- not much thought for the dynamic nature of the content/site.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All I can say is, I agree with you 100% &#8230; great observation of the new redesign. A little bit a of a &#8220;fail&#8221; in my opinion as well. </p>
<p>Designs like this it is easy to see a lot of attention to detail above-the-fold and then see it fall a apart &#8212; not much thought for the dynamic nature of the content/site.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tommie</title>
		<link>http://dougdosberg.com/2008/07/24/propeller-redesign-fail/#comment-5243</link>
		<author>Tommie</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 01:58:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://dougdosberg.com/2008/07/24/propeller-redesign-fail/#comment-5243</guid>
		<description>I think it's mostly a problem with colors. It kinda feels like the designer thought "fuck it" and just went along with whatever the directors said even though he probably knew better. There were probably someone that said "you MUST use these colors".</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it&#8217;s mostly a problem with colors. It kinda feels like the designer thought &#8220;fuck it&#8221; and just went along with whatever the directors said even though he probably knew better. There were probably someone that said &#8220;you MUST use these colors&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Propeller Redesign. Fail? &#124; WhiteSandsDigital.com</title>
		<link>http://dougdosberg.com/2008/07/24/propeller-redesign-fail/#comment-5232</link>
		<author>Propeller Redesign. Fail? &#124; WhiteSandsDigital.com</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 17:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://dougdosberg.com/2008/07/24/propeller-redesign-fail/#comment-5232</guid>
		<description>[...] only was I surprised by the radical new layout, I was confused by their new molecule looking logo. read more &#124; digg [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] only was I surprised by the radical new layout, I was confused by their new molecule looking logo. read more | digg [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
